Diploma of Nursing for Protection or Punishment- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theDiploma of Nursing for Protection or Punishment. Answer: Mandatory detention: protection or punishment? The 21st century world has witnessed a plethora of changes in terms of the political happenings, of which the mandatory detention policy prevalent in Australia since 1992 is of major concern. Compulsory detainment or imprisonment of those individuals seeking political asylum falls under this practice. The unauthorized arrivals and unlawful non-citizens are detained as per this practice due to enactment of Migration Reform Act, 1992. However, decline in health and mental wellbeing of the detainees has been put under scanner of rigorous investigations. Whilst under detention, the extent of emotional and psychological damage of the asylum seekers has been a topic of concern (Crock Miller, 2013). This presentation will aim to give an overview on the throbbing issue by arguing whether the plan acts as a protective measure or punishment for the detainees. Discussions will be pursued by referring to legal, cultural, ethical aspects alongside relevance to professional practice. The history of mandatory detention dates back to the year 1992, which was initially reckoned as an exceptional and temporary measure to cater to addressing a particular class of individuals comprising of the Indochinese unauthorized boat arrivals who were fleeing in the aftermath of Vietnam War. It was perceived upon introduction by the Keating government, that this practice would result in facilitation of the processing surrounding refugee claims, abate unlawful migration as well as be economical in terms of relocating the people back to community. On a recent publication by Murphy (2017), it has been argued by the author on the eve of the 25 years of the introduction of mandatory detention, that instead of possible good, the purpose of the practice has been defeated. This practice may be detected as a solemn reminder of the utilization of power, control and political vilification to meet the political ends. Subsequent research carried out with respect to understanding the human rig hts and mental health care of the detainees have highlighted on crucial aspects. Empirical evidences have suggested that there remain potential threats to the mental health and safekeeping of the human rights of the asylum seekers who remain under the obligation of the mandatory detention practice thereby necessitating the advocacy and engagement of the health professionals and psychiatrists to intervene into the situation. Relevant findings have supported the greater incidence and prevalence of several mental health issues like that of depression, suicide ideation and post traumatic stress disorder among the detainees heavily dependent upon the duration of detention most commonly among the irregular maritime arrivals and among those representing history of torture and trauma (Newman, Proctor, Dudley, 2013). Owing to such situations, recent report have brought to the forefront on intensification of pressure on the federal government and opposition against their bipartisan cruel tre atment as exerted upon refugees and asylum seekers specifically for those kept in offshore detention, thus emphasizing on denouncing the operational immigration detention facilities paving way for entry into mainstream of Australian society (Price, 2017). Therefore, time has arrived to reevaluate and consider the proceedings of the detention policy that is in vogue in Australian context. Over the years, the practicing norms carried out as part of mandatory detention shows that the increasing demands of healthcare needs and barriers to access of care facilities for the refugees and community asylum seekers act on the way for providing adequate care to the concerned individuals. As far as physical health status of these individuals is concerned, they are likely to suffer from infectious and chronic diseases thereby representing a complex mode of medical profile. The commonly reported problems in them include respiratory and musculoskeletal disorders, whereas sexual and reproductive health issues were also commonplace. Besides direct effect on the asylum seekers, their family and children are also most likely to encounter certain debilitating conditions related to physical and mental wellbeing. Political barriers in conjunction with systemic barriers and certain socio-cultural factors also seem to affect the health related outcomes in the concerned population. Reports s uggest that there are strict violations of the international human rights laws and conventions due to faulty Australian asylum seekers policies that act to exacerbate the trauma of the detainees (Hadgkiss Renzaho, 2016). Further, in recent times the issue related to occupational experiences of the refugees as well as asylum seekers who has resettled in Australia has also been a matter of concern for the investigators. Provision of strengthening the link between the discourse and occupational justice for these marginalized groups need to be established to confer better occupational opportunities for them (Mayne, Lowrie, Wilson, 2016). Therefore, the outlook towards this secluded population is seeing drastic transformations these days calling greater attention. The attitudes of the Australian community towards the asylum seekers and refugees have been a pivotal focus of lately. Relevant research has highlighted that myriad of misconceptions, misunderstandings and myths revolve round the commoners perceptions about the marginalized population. Majority of the reasons for such behavior has been attributed to government policies and political predispositions. They are often seen as criminal offenders due to prejudices and preconceived notions. Threats to national security because of the boat arrivals as posed by conservative politicians also act as hindrances to the services meant for them. The false notion of demarcating them as illegal entrants due to media and political projections is also held responsible for such discriminating and prejudiced behavior (Higgins, 2016). Experts have also keenly observed the issue of immigration detention whereby the countrys response to the humanitarian problem has been severely questioned and criticized as certain rights of this vulnerable population has been violated due to observance of faulty and regressive practices that have resulted in exerting detrimental effects (Brown, 2017). The delicate and sensitive issue related to mandatory detention is of pivotal importance to deal with the health and wellbeing of the concerned population who are at stake of encountering challenges. A collaborative and compassionate approach on the part of the healthcare professionals, especially the nurse who work as frontline healthcare personnel is essential to resolve their situations in a more comprehensive, humane manner in alliance with the existing guidelines. References Brown, P. (2017). Immigration detention, Australia's response to a humanitarian problem.Australian Humanist, The, (126), 12. Crock, M., Miller, D. (2013). Mandatory Detention of Asylum Seekers in Australia.Hum. Rts. Defender,22, 17. Hadgkiss, E. J., Renzaho, A. (2016). The health status, service needs and barriers to accessing care for detention and community-based asylum seekers in Australia. InGlobalisation, Migration and Health: Challenges and Opportunities(pp. 255-289). Higgins, C. (2016). Australian Community Attitudes to Asylum Seekers and Refugees.Hum. Rts. Defender,25, 25. Mayne, J., Lowrie, D., Wilson, J. (2016). Occupational Experiences of Refugees and Asylum Seekers Resettling in Australia: A Narrative Review.OTJR: occupation, participation and health,36(4), 204-215. Murphy, K. (2017). Cry if you want to as mandatory detention turns 25.Eureka Street,27(8), 8. Newman, L., Proctor, N., Dudley, M. (2013). Seeking asylum in Australia: immigration detention, human rights and mental health care.Australasian Psychiatry,21(4), 315-320. Price, S. (2017). It's time to close the camps and bring them here.Green Left Weekly, (1141), 7.